Sedentary Behaviour Kills Lives

Sedentary Behaviour Kills Lives

Sedentary lifestyle is one of the major factors contributing to metabolic syndrome and non-communicable diseases, and is therefore a major contributor to morbidity (development of disease in a population) and mortality rates.

It is true, we have chosen a title that is more of a spoiler than a title.

Need to raise awareness

Moreover, I would be delighted if you stopped reading here because you got the message and decided to make the necessary lifestyle changes so that sedentary lifestyle doesn’t “kill” you.

I know that almost everyone is aware of the concept that doing sport/being active is healthy.

Sedentary Person

But it seems that, although the idea flutters around in the heads of many (and when I say many, I mean more than half of the population in Spain), it has not yet been put into practice.

What is the daily life of a sedentary person like?

  • He gets out of bed, gets dressed and sits down for breakfast.
  • He takes the car to work (seated), sits in front of a computer (seated), has lunch (seated), continues his working day (seated), drives home (seated)…
  • He sits on the sofa to relax while watching TV and eating something (seated), goes shopping in the car (seated), does the grocery shopping (very light activity), drives back home (seated), eats dinner while taking advantage of his Netflix/HBO account (seated) and goes to bed.

In the 24 hours of the day, that person will have spent about 21 hours sitting or lying down and about 3 hours standing or with very light activity.

Sedentary lifestyle

We could even say, without too much fear of being wrong, that during those 3 hours on his feet, he used lifts or escalators.

With this article, I want to show you an uncomfortable reality so that you can see that the phrase in the title is not “an exaggerated way of speaking”, nor any kind of headline aimed at generating “clickbait” or anything of the sort.

Sedentary lifestyles as a public health problem

There are 3 pillars on which a public health problem becomes a priority:

  1. Prevalence and trend of the problem: Situations affecting a large number of people, or involving a clear risk factor that is expanding, will be addressed.
  2. Magnitude of risk associated with exposure to the problem: For example, according to the WHO, consumption of processed meats and smoking are risk factors for cancer, however, the risk posed by smoking is much higher than that of red meat. Therefore, anti-smoking measures would take precedence over measures against the consumption of these meat products.
  3. Evidence of effective prevention and control: Following on from the example above, avoiding tobacco use is known to be a very effective strategy to prevent many types of cancer, so comprehensive strategies to prevent tobacco use are pursued.

Human beings and sedentary lifestyles

Depending on lifestyle, work activity or the need to use vehicles for travel, we can find people who, without being involved in a sporting activity per se, are physically active, and on the contrary, people who practice sport every day, but outside of that time spend most of their time sitting down or without activity.

Physical inactivity and health risks

Assessing the consequences of a sedentary lifestyle

Related to this, a meta-analysis was published in 2015 that aimed to assess the association between inactivity time and its health consequences, independently of physical activity.

In other words, the aim was to see whether hours of sedentary time are harmful per se

Sedentary time was considered to be time spent sitting, watching television or in a reclining position.

Health factors related to sedentary lifestyles

The health factors included were:

  • All-cause mortality,
  • Incidence and mortality of cardiovascular disease,
  • Diabetes mellitus II and cancer, in addition to
  • All-cause hospitalisations.

Cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus II and cancer are considered the main non-communicable diseases.

Diseases caused by sedentary lifestyles

It should be noted that only observational studies were included in this meta-analysis.

The greater the sedentary lifestyle, the greater the risk of disease

Specifically, the highest relative risk associated with sedentary lifestyles found in this study was the risk of developing type II diabetes, which soared to over 90% in sedentary subjects.

In relation to mortality and the incidence of various types of cancer, it appears that a sedentary lifestyle acts as a risk factor for breast, colon, endometrial and ovarian epithelial cancer.

What the authors were able to see was the strong association between longer sedentary time and higher mortality rates and incidences of disease.

Sedentary lifestyles and increased disease

The most important results of this analysis are that sedentary lifestyles would increase by …

  • 24% the risk of all-cause mortality.
  • 91% the risk of developing type II diabetes mellitus.
  • 14% the incidence of cardiovascular disease.
  • 18% the mortality from cardiovascular disease.
  • 13% the incidence and 16% the mortality from cancer.

However, these figures should not be taken as absolute truths, since, as the authors of the meta-analysis themselves point out, many of the studies evaluated had serious limitations.

Nevertheless, it can be stated that there is a clear relationship between increased sedentary time and health loss, regardless of physical activity.

Sedentary lifestyles and the development of non-communicable diseases

Lack of physical activity is a key factor in the spread of major non-communicable diseases.

Why am I fat?

Proof of this is a study published in the prestigious journal The Lancet in 2012. The authors wanted to estimate the proportion of cases of these diseases (cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus II and cancer) that could have been avoided if sedentary individuals had been active, and the gain in life expectancy that this would have entailed.

This was based on the PAF (population attributable fraction), a statistical concept that estimates the proportion of cases that would not have occurred in the absence of a given risk factor (in this case, sedentary lifestyle).

According to his calculations, they could be reduced globally if all inactive individuals became active:

  • 6% of cases of cardiovascular disease,
  • 7% of cases of type II diabetes mellitus,
  • 10% of cases of breast and colon cancer.

With these figures in hand, physical inactivity is a risk factor comparable to smoking and obesity.

Although these numbers may seem small, given the high incidence of these diseases, it is estimated that more than 5.3 million deaths could have been avoided in 2008 if the sedentary population had been active.

Sedentary lifestyles and economic costs

Physical inactivity not only has an impact on health expenditure, but also has a global impact, as it causes indirect costs in terms of reduced productivity due to illness or premature mortality.

Sedentary Lifestyles and Economic Costs

Ding et al. (2016) calculated the global economic cost of physical inactivity in 142 countries based on data from 2013.

For this purpose, the prevalence of physical inactivity, the cases of disease derived exclusively from physical inactivity and the estimation of cases that could be avoided by eliminating sedentary lifestyles were related.

Costs of physical inactivity in Spain

According to this study, in Spain alone, physical inactivity represents direct costs of more than 1700 million euros, and more than 245 million euros in indirect costs, i.e., almost a total of 2,000,000,000,000 euros.

Of these, almost three quarters are paid for by the public sector and much of the remaining fraction is paid for directly by us.

Sedentary life

So a sedentary lifestyle not only kills, but impoverishes us as a society in every way.

Imagine the amount of money que supondría, that would be involved, if we add to this the health costs of other avoidable risk factors such as poor diet, smoking and/or alcohol and drug use, among others.

What are the factors that make a person physically active or not?

There are certain factors that seem to influence the performance of physical activity (Bauman et al., 2012). Some of them act as a “fish that bites its own tail”, let me explain.

Physiological factors

These are examples of factors that are negatively related to activity performance:

  • Overweight,
  • perceived exertion,
  • stress,
  • poor health, and
  • lack of self-efficacy (or not being independent in day-to-day life).

Overweight and sedentary lifestyles

All these factors can be improved through regular physical activity, but they can also be aggravated in the absence of physical activity, predisposing to a further increase in sedentary lifestyles and thus a worsening of these conditions.

Social factors

On the other hand, educational level, having previously participated in sporting activities, the pursuit of a certain aesthetic and being in good health are factors that are related to people being more active.

Of course, there are many other influencing factors, for example, at the environmental level, such as the presence of sports facilities, the urban layout or the requirement for and availability of transport.

Social factors Sedentary lifestyles

Or at the political level, such as educational plans that emphasise the implementation of physical activity or the promotion of exercise through campaigns at the community level.

Get up from your chair!

As mentioned at the beginning, it is possible to meet the official physical activity recommendations (about 150 minutes/week of moderate to vigorous physical activity) and still spend long periods of time sitting which compromises metabolic health.

Too much sitting is bad

It has been shown that long periods of absence of muscle loading (sitting) have biological consequences that can be counteracted by simply standing (Owen et al., 2010).

In fact, in individuals who complied with these recommendations, it has been observed that the more time they spent watching TV (sitting), the more health markers were negatively affected, such as blood pressure, waist circumference, glucose tolerance and blood lipid levels.

What to do if we have to sit for a long time?

We often have to remain seated because of our day-to-day circumstances, the most common being work.

Does this mean that an increased risk of worsening health is inevitable?

A very relevant finding of the latest research is the importance of “breaking periods of sedentary lifestyles”.

Do not spend too much time sitting

This involves something as simple as moving from sitting to standing, or from standing upright to walking and moving around.

Something as simple as that has been linked to lower waist circumference, lower body mass index, lower triglyceride concentrations and better glucose tolerance.

Promote active travel

For these reasons, it is essential to try to limit the time we spend sitting, and in this context, strategies such as moving around actively, rather than using cars, become even more important.

Cycling to work

In relation to active travel, we could include avoiding lifts and escalators where possible, or if not possible, cycling to work….

Physical activity as a protective agent

Although, as we have already mentioned, spending a large number of hours a day sitting is a metabolic risk factor.

In a meta-analysis published in 2016 by Ekelund et al., they decided to examine how physical activity affects the risk of all-cause mortality from sedentary lifestyles.

Study of physical activity and mortality risk

A study was carried out on the basis of a series of criteria with their corresponding weighting:

Sitting TimeFrom 0 to 4 hoursFrom 4 to 6 hoursFrom 6 to 8 hoursOver 8 hours
TV hours/strong>Less than 1 hourFrom 1 to 2 hoursFrom 3 to 4 hoursOver 5 hours
Physical Activity Level35,5 MET-h/week (60 – 75 minutes of moderate activity per day)30 MET-h/week (50 – 65 minutes of moderate activity per day)16 MET-h/week (25 – 35 minutes of moderate activity per day)2,5 MET-h/week (5 minutes of moderate activity per day)

What could be seen by cross-checking the available data was a clear dose-response association between sitting time, physical activity and all-cause mortality.

Before reading on, I would like you to be honest and place yourself in the group that you would belong to.

  • To do this first, select the hours you spend sitting and then set your activity level.
  • Then, choose the hours of TV/series/movies/social media/Youtube you spend per day and again combine it with your level of physical activity.

Sitting time mortality risk

As expected, the highest risk of death appeared in the group with the lowest physical activity rate (2,5 MET-h/week) and the highest sitting time (>8 hours).

This group corresponds to the highest point of those shown in the graph below, and its mortality risk was set at 58% higher than that of the reference group (the most active and with the least sitting hours).

Graphic 1 Sendentary

Association between mortality risk, number of sitting hours and activity level (Ekelund et al., 2016).

Mortality risk and TV hours

Regarding the risk of all-cause mortality and the relationship with TV hours, the authors found a similar distribution:

Graphic 2 Sendentary

Association between mortality risk, number of TV hours and activity level (Ekelund et al., 2016).

Note again how the risk skyrockets in the most sedentary group and the group that consumes the most hours of TV per day.

Study conclusions

Two things are quite clear from these graphs:

  • Lack of physical activity and spending too much time sitting and/or watching TV make us vulnerable and are clear risk factors for all-cause mortality.
  • Physical activity minimises the risk of mortality.

I want us to remember, above all, this last sentence…

As we have mentioned several times throughout this article, we often have to sit for more than 8 hours a day, simply for work reasons. Think of any office worker, a transport worker or a student…

Do 1 hour of activity per day

This study shows how the risk of mortality can be drastically reduced (but not completely eliminated) when at least one hour of moderate to vigorous activity per day is undertaken.

As is the case for the 35.5 MET-h group (60 – 75 minutes of activity per day).

Do one hour of sport a day

Even though they may spend more than 8 hours a day sitting down.

Why does watching TV “increase the risk of mortality”?

Another aspect to note, which I don’t know if you have noticed, is how hours of TV viewing increase the risk of mortality more markedly than hours of sedentary “non-TV” viewing.

But, why can this happen?

No movement at all

Surely, if a person consumes more than 3 – 5 hours of TV a day (and when I say TV, I include watching series, films or videos on Youtube), he/she will be spending most of his/her free time on it.

Therefore, avoiding any kind of physical activity.

Unhealthy snacks while watching TV

Unhealthy snacks

In addition, snacking or consuming superfluous and undesirable products (soft drinks, bagged snacks, biscuits, juices, pastries, processed nuts, etc.) while we are in front of a screen during our leisure time is typical, aggravating the problem even more.

Lack of time for sport?

Many people justify not doing sports or not being physically active with a lack of time.

No sport and watching TV

But those same people are able to watch 3 or 4 episodes of their favourite series every day and/or dedicate 1 or 2 hours to their social networks (and I am being generous in both cases).

And you, are you part of that group?

Conclusion

Much of what is stated in these lines are obvious things, but what they are intended to emphasise is the message that the earlier we start being physically active, the better, and that it is never too late to start being physically active.

Do you really need more reasons to start exercising?

Bibliographic Sources

  1. Owen et al., (2010). Sedentary behavior: Emerging evidence for a new health risk.
  2. Khol et al., (2012). The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health.
  3. Biswas et al., (2015). Sedentary time and its association with risk for disease incidence, mortality and hospitalization in adults.
  4. Lee et al., (2012). Impact of physical inactivity on the world’s major non-communicable diseases.
  5. Ding et al., (2016). The economic burden of physical inactivity: a global analysis of major non-communicable diseases.
  6. Bauman et al., (2012). Correles of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not?
  7. Owen et al., (2010). Too much sitting: the population-health science of sedentary behavior.
  8. Ekelund et al., (2016). Does physical activity attenuate, or even eliminate, the detrimental association of sitting time with mortality? A harmonised meta-analysis of data from more than 1 million men and women.

Related Entries

  • Change Your Habits Now!
  • Treadmill Desks
Content Protection by DMCA.com
About Carlos Sánchez
Carlos Sánchez
Meet our author Carlos Sánchez, a graduate in Human Nutrition and Dietetics. All his actions are backed by science.
Check Also
Muscle vs Fat
Muscle vs Fat

Body fat and muscle are two completely different tissues. They have different structures and functions, …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exoneration of liability
This blog does not aim to give any medical suggestions, treatments, or diagnoses. Please consult with your doctor for any issues or questions about your health. The nature of the blog’s articles is merely informative, the articles do not constitute any medical diagnosis or treatment. The various authors of the blog’s articles expose their own opinions, and HSN does not determine the topic, the content, and the statements contained in the texts.
Health Registration No: 26.11001/GR
Health Registration No: 40.048706/GR
Health Registration No: 26.017818/O